The Chemtrail Theory

ett

Given that we, as a society are lead and mislead and misdirected through manipulating our fears, Chemtrails are a leading contender of the list of misdirections within the “truth” movement as a whole, objectivity is required to interpret the information without fear.

It all started in 1996 when the military released a document called “Owning The Weather”
csat.au.af.mil/2025/volume3/vol3ch15.pdf

Two years later the psy-op disinformation campaign had begun… Given that a person has no idea what is going on all they have to do is come up with another assumption on why it’s being done… Rather than actually figure it out… If it was being done in the first place… right? Who is “Deep Sky”
text –

“Thomas called his contact “Deep Sky.” Deep Sky confirmed that the chemicals being spread in the exercises were acting as electrolytes, enhancing conductivity of radar and radio waves. Additionally, the spread of the material was actually degrading, not enhancing, ATC radars – so there had to be some other purpose behind the sprayings. It is significant that many of the exercises were conducted out of Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, in Ohio, which, according to Thomas, “has long been deeply engaged in HAARP’s electromagnetic warfare program.””
– http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com/keytopics/Chemtrails.shtml

At this point “deep sky” must know he’s talking to someone who is not well informed because he goes on to talk about how Aluminum is being used in these tests… What’s going to happen if you want to do a test to look for aluminum in just about any material on Earth? Well… therein lies a very large problem… Aluminum is EVERYWHERE NATURALLY IN ABUNDANCE… LITERALLY... What a better way to scare the shit out of somebody than by telling someone the government is dropping Aluminum from the sky, everywhere you test you’re going to find it… Any burning of fossil fuels and coal will spread Aluminum into the atmosphere…
Text –

“Aluminum has been identified in at least 596 of the 1,699 hazardous waste sites that have been proposed for inclusion on the EPA National Priorities List (NPL) (HazDat 2008). However, the number of sites evaluated for Aluminum is not known. The frequency of these sites can be seen in Figure 6-1. Of these sites, 590 are located within the United States, 2 are located in Guam, 3 are located in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and 1 is located in the Virgin Islands (not shown). Aluminum is the most abundant metal and the third most abundant element in the earth’s crust, comprising about 8.8% by weight (88 g/kg). It is never found free in nature and is found in most rocks, particularly igneous rocks as aluminosilicate minerals (Lide 2005; Staley and Haupin 1992). Aluminum is also present in air, water, and many foods. Aluminum enters environmental media naturally through the weathering of rocks and minerals. Anthropogenic releases are in the form of air emissions, waste water effluents, and solid waste primarily associated with industrial processes, such as aluminum production. Because of its prominence as a major constituent of the earth’s crust, natural weathering processes far exceed the contribution of releases to air, water, and land associated with human activities (Lantzy and MacKenzie 1979). The behavior of aluminum in the environment depends upon its coordination chemistry and the characteristics of the local environment, especially pH. The major features of the biogeochemical cycle of aluminum include leaching of aluminum from geochemical formations and soil particulates to aqueous environments, adsorption onto soil or sediment particulates, and wet and dry deposition from the air to land and surface water. Generally, Aluminum is not bioaccumulated to a significant extent. However, certain plants can accumulate high concentrations of Aluminum. For example, tea leaves may contain very high concentrations of aluminum, >5,000 mg/kg in old leaves (Dong et al. 1999). Other plants that may contain high levels of aluminum include Lycopodium (Lycopodiaceae), a few ferns, Symplocos (Symplocaceae), and Orites (Proteaceae) (Jansen et al. 2002). Aluminum does not appear to accumulate to any significant degree in cow’s milk or beef tissue and is, therefore, not expected to undergo biomagnification in terrestrial food chains (DOE 1984). Similarly, because of its toxicity to many aquatic organisms, including fish, aluminum does not bioconcentrate in aquatic organisms to any significant degree (Rosseland et al. 1990). ”
– http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp22-c6.pdf

So what do you think? A few hundred years of burning fossil fuels into the atmosphere isn’t going to make aluminum concentration even higher than it’s supposed to be? no matter where you test? Hhmmmm… Do you mean to tell me that if I want to do a “chemtrail” test that my data is completely messed up because Aluminum exists everywhere in abundance? That’s right… Testing for Aluminum is not proof of chemtrails… There goes a few hundred videos debunked… While we are on the subject of testing… Lets go for Barium.

A coal plant may produce 1.4million pounds of Barium every single year, even though there is a push for decommissioning in 2012 there are still 572 coal plants in operation in the US ALONE… that’s about 800 million pounds of Barium from coal plants per year in the US ALONE… Barium is not an indication of chemtrails, Barium has been a pollutant since the industrial revolution…

A commonly used meme in the chemtrail theory are the photos of barrels on aircraft. These are used in testing to see how the aircraft performs under different weight loads. pumping water into different barrels to imitate a higher weightload at the rear/front, sides etc.  – http://metabunk.org/threads/661-Debunked-Chemtrail-Plane-Interior-(Ballast-Barrels)

Inside_Boeing__Building_the_777-20120720-164530

Another Common misconception is that Contrails are only caused by Jet exhaust, and didn’t occur until recently.
Memphis Belle WWII Bomber Contrails – 1944

“Beyond the day-to-day dangers of burning coal to produce energy, there is the devastating impact of plant malfunctions. In December 2008, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) reported the failure of a holding pond used by a coal-fired electric plant. When heavy rains washed away the holding-pond dike, more than 2.2 million pounds of hazardous waste flooded 300 acres in east Tennessee. Even after the best cleanup effort, the area will remain polluted with dangerous byproducts for decades.

It remains impossible to quantify the amount of poisons released by the above incident, but in one year, this plant reportedly produced 45,000 pounds of arsenic, 49,000 pounds of lead, 1.4 million pounds of barium, 91,000 pounds of chromium, and 140,000 pounds of manganese, much of this held in the holding pond and all of which can cause cancer, liver damage, neurological trauma and more. The TVA, in conjunction with the EPA, warned that pets and children should avoid contact with the toxic materials.

The EPA reported that high levels of arsenic, lead and thallium were found in samples taken from downstream water sources, where hundreds of dead fish were found. While the authority is using heavy construction equipment to address the cleanup efforts, officials cannot predict how long it will take nor the final costs involved.”
– 
http://www.ecohearth.com/eco-zine/green-issues/401-the-dangers-of-coal-burning-power-plants-.html

“As of 2012, there are 572 operational coal plants in the U.S.”
http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_energy/coalvswind/c01.html – private

Let’s go back to our psy-operator “Deep Sky”

In the link above the writer went on to mention a random opinion of his… An opinion that has no backing whatsoever, there is no evidence of it, so why does anybody believe in it? That opinion was:

What I’m convinced of now, is that the widespread flu-like and Alzheimer’s symptoms have been mere side effects of the sprayed chemicals, and not the direct purpose of the spraying.  The extensive use of aluminum oxide, found as the primary component of these reflective clouds, does have serious medical side effects and may well explain the upsurge in Alzheimer’s disease in the US–which is reaching epidemic proportions. I think it is also clear that the government has been experimenting with different types and mixes of chemicals, which explains why the observations and effects differ over time. Several years ago, there were many sightings of sticky droplets falling from the sky, trailing spider-web-like strands behind. Upon contact they made people very ill. Later chemical analysis has shown a lot of aluminum oxide and micro fibers, also composed of barium and aluminum. People living under these spray patterns have developed Alzheimer’s-like symptoms.
– http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com/keytopics/Chemtrails.html

Contrail.fourengined.arpSince we now know that aluminum and barium have been massive pollutants for 200 years, how the hell are the materials linked to aircraft? Where is the evidence of scientific testing of aircraft? It doesn’t exist, nobody has come forth with evaluation on pollutants from aircraft.

I have shown with evidence that the main pollutants people talk about, aluminum and barium, have been major pollutants for 200 years. Thus there is no manner of finding out if they have come from an aircraft without testing the aircraft itself.

The next article is the first time a person had ever mentioned and/or implied that the military might be spraying over people’s heads. It is explained that military craft will “fuel dump” before landing. This is the very article which began the entire scare worldwide into the belief of chemtrails. Notice that in some parts of this article that you are not reading from a person who knows entirely what is going on, you are reading what he believes is true. The “fuel dumps” would occur near this man’s home before landing, that much is true, the rest of the article is an opinion piece.

Condensation trails, called contrails, are generated at altitudes high enough for water droplets to freeze in a matter of seconds and not quickly evaporate – typically where the temperatures are below -38 degrees Celcius.

Contrails can form through the addition of water vapor to the air from the jet engine exhaust. Even tiny nuclei released in the exhaust fumes may be sufficient to generate ice crystals, and hence, condensation trails.

Wallace wonders if ethylene dibromide, a highly toxic component of JP-8 jet fuel, is making people sick. Similar incidents over Las Vegas last year prompted a US Air Force spokesman to explain that the military aircraft were “dumping fuel” before landing.

But the strange spray patterns are being reported repeatedly over towns in Tennessee, Connecticut, New Hampshire, New York, Nevada, Idaho, Mississippi, Montana, Oklahoma, Washington state and California.

Wallace has been watching formations of high-flying jets weave grid-like contrails above his home since last summer. Each time, “We get a taste in our mouth,” he reports. He and his wife Ann get “kind of tired and sick,” having “no energy to do anything.”

After plants began dying around his mountain cabin, “I got real sick for about three weeks,” Wallace relates. “My eyes watered. Fluid came out of my nose. I could hardly move my arm up above my head to comb my hair for about a week.”

Wallace and his wife are not alone in their plight. In March, 1996, Dr. Greg Hanford bought an expensive camera and binoculars to keep an eye on jets spraying white bands above his Bakersfield, California home. Hanford has counted 40 or 60 jets on some “spray days.”
– http://web.archive.org/web/19990429021525/http://ens.lycos.com/ens/jan99/1999L-01-08-05.html

Fuel dumping is common on both large commercial widebody airliners and virtually all military planes. Many aircraft require the ability to dump fuel because of landing weight restrictions imposed by the manufacturers. Although a plane may be able to takeoff at a certain weight, its structure and landing gear may only be able to withstand the impact of landing at a much lower weight. This difference between maximum takeoff weight and maximum landing weight may be tens of thousands of pounds or even over a hundred thousand pounds for very large planes. In other situations, an aircraft may be at an acceptable landing weight but forced to make an emergency landing at a runway that is too short. It may be necessary to dump fuel to reduce the plane’s weight low enough in order to make a safe landing on a shorter field.

It is certainly possible for a plane to land safely when heavier than its maximum certified landing weight. This weight is based on more than just the structural limitations of the plane but takes factors like runway length, center of gravity limits, and flap deflections into account. Airline pilots are often forced to land at weights above the certified limits because of bad weather, scheduling, or fuel conservation requirements. While such landings pose no safety danger to the passengers, a maintenance inspection is required any time a plane lands above its certified landing weight. The length and complexity of this check can vary depending on the quality of the landing. If it is smooth and uneventful, the inspection may be brief. A hard landing, on the other hand, might require a time-consuming and maintenance-intensive checkout that takes the plane out of service for a considerable length of time.
– http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/planes/q0245b.shtml

TIME TO DUMP FORMULA:
http://www.atpflightschool.com/students/downloads/PrepFormulas.pdf
2,300 lb. / min was given as an example

As an example of fuel dumping…
Anytime a plane takes off and has any sort of issue right after takeoff it has to return and dump.

“Residents in the vicinity of Newark International Airport were complaining about the smell of gas Sunday afternoon after a Boeing 777 dumped 170,000 pounds of jet fuel into the air while preparing for an emergency landing. The plane, carrying 269 passengers bound for Tokyo, returned to the airport less than an hour after takeoff yesterday because of a “hydraulic problem.” But before it could touch down, it needed to lighten up by emptying its fuel tanks over the Garden State.”
– http://gothamist.com/2010/05/10/lots_of_jet_fuel_dumped_over_jersey.php

Aircraft Pollution in tons per year over NYC alone.
Landing & Takeoffs (LTOs) 383,206 452,950
Volatile Organic Compounds 3,025 4,839
Carbon Monoxide 8,712 12,808
Nitrogen Oxides 5,729 9,574
Sulfur Dioxide 270 364

In 1996 the EPA reported a known 127 fuel dumpings by commercial craft at an average of 11K pounds alone… However…

“Fuel Jettison over land

Risk analysis studies need to be executed and delivered to area at risk for Fuel Jettison over land. In the new NAR, the land is a preferable route to the sea where Fuel Jettison Risk was mitigated.

No impact studies have been executed by the FAA on this topic. Guidelines were requested however in 2000.”
– http://www.ourairspace.org/environmental.html

Another point to bring up is the fact that each of the fuels mentioned here are made up of thousands of different chemicals. If they want to kill us… They don’t have to add anything or deliberately spray, the military still uses JP8 fuel which is highly toxic… So all you have to do, is keep on flying.
http://www.exxonmobil.com/AviationGlobal/Files/WorldJetFuelSpecifications2005.pdf

“The assertion that the government is spraying noxious chemicals on its own people from high flying military aircraft needs some real substantiation than just reports of seeing contrails in the sky and claiming they are making people sick. While there have been reports of similar activity in the past, merely seeing a jet contrail in the sky does not prove anything.

Persistence of contrails is neither an indication that they contain some kind of chemical, nor that it is some kind of spray. As a matter of fact, sailors have known for years to look specifically at the patterns and persistence of jet contrails for weather forecasting. If a jet is flying through air at altitude with a low humidity, the moist air from the jet engine might produce a slight, short-lived contrail. These short-lived contrails are a sign that the weather will be fair. A thick, long-lasting contrail indicates humid air high in the atmosphere, and can be an early sign of a storm”

-Why Planes Make Vapor Trails
-Popular Science, March 1943. Page 55.
http://books.google.com/books?id=KCcDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA55#v=onepage&q&f=false

A new study based on historical data examines Allied air raids, including one on May 11, 1944, in which 1,980 aircraft took flight into Germany. Behind the planes, witnesses described the sky turning white, and temperature records show that the air turned slightly, but significantly, cooler.

The study, published in the International Journal of Climatology, highlights these observations and other historical data, weather reports and flight logs of Allied air campaigns between 1943 and 1945.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=contrails-aviation-affects-climate

WW2 contrails over Belgium
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jo6rgrnY6TU

PERSISTENT and SPREADING CONTRAILS in WW2- Memphus Belle.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8zTYbx995M

The Memphis Belle: A Story Of A Flying Fortress (1944)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXgVEu0htd0

Thanks to Asura of Occupy Tesla for this article http://www.facebook.com/OccupyTesla